Medical education at the crossroads. How to step into the future of medicine and medicine of the future?



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Global changes in recent decades, caused by scientific and technological breakthroughs, which are characterized as a genomic revolution and the fourth industrial revolution, raise new pressing issues both for society as a whole and for public health. The latter can not exist and develop without a qualitative, and most importantly, modern medical education, in which significant changes are also taking place. In particular, the transition to standards by the World Federation of Medical Education (WFME) and the Association of Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) - «International Standards of Medical Education for Improving the Quality of Health» (Copenhagen, March 15-19, 2003). In this article, based on the analysis of trends in the development of health care and medical education, possible options for correcting approaches in the teaching of morphological disciplines (normal anatomy, histology, pathology) in medical universities are considered.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. P Kiyasov

Kazan (Volga region) Federal University

Email: kiassov@mail.ru

R. V Deev

I.P. Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University

E. V Kiyasova

Kazan (Volga region) Federal University

A. A Gumerova

Kazan (Volga region) Federal University

References

  1. Швец В.А., Цветков С А., Овчинников Д.В., Деев Р.В. От госпитальной школы к факультету подготовки врачей. СПб.: Реноме, 2012.
  2. Аврус А. И. История российских университетов: Очерки. М.: Московский общественный научный фонд, 2001.
  3. Биографический словарь профессоров и преподавателей Императорского Казанского университета (1804-1904). Под ред. Н.П. Загоскина. Ч. 2. Казань, 1904: 389-434.
  4. Деев Р.В., Зацепин В.В. Роль И.П. Франка в становлении преподавания терапии в Медико-Хирургической Академии. Итоговая конференция военно-научного общества курсантов и слушателей академии. СПб.: ВМедА,1999. с. 57.
  5. Одинцова И.А. Преподавание гистологии, эмбриологии, цитологии в условиях реформирования высшей школы. Морфология 2013; 3: 81-4.
  6. Johnson E.O., Charchanti A.V., Troupis T.G. Modernization of an Anatomy Class: From Conceptualization to Implementation. A Case for Integrated Multimodal-Multidisciplinary Teaching. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2012; 5: 354-66.
  7. Машталир М.А. Клинические моменты в преподавании анатомии человека: наш и зарубежный опыт. Морфологія 2007; 1(3): 114-6.
  8. Сулаева О.Н. Отбор содержания обучения по гистологии в достижении стандартов медицинского образования. Актуальні проблеми сучасної медицини 2015; 15t3t51): 276-8.
  9. Павлович Е.Р. Современные проблемы морфологической науки и образования. Успехи современного естествознания 2006; 2: 74.
  10. Kottler M. J. From 48 to 46: cytological technique, preconception, and the counting of human chromosomes. Bull. History of Med. 1974; 48: 465-502.
  11. Шевлюк Н.Н., Стадников А.А. Изучение проблем морфогенеза и регенерации на этапах высшего медицинского образования. Морфология 2015; 147(3): 45-7.
  12. Bergman E.M., Prince K.J., Drukker J. et al. How much anatomy is enough? Anat. Sci. Educ. 2008; 1: 184-8.
  13. Bergman E.M., van der Vleuten C.P., Scherpbier A.J. Why don't they know enough about anatomy? A narrative review. Med. Teach. 2011; 33: 403-9.
  14. Gogalniceanu P., Fitzgerald O'Connor E, Raftery A. Undergraduate anatomy teaching in the UK. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2009; 91: S102-6.
  15. Korf H.W., Wicht H., Snipes R.L. et al. The dissection course -necessary and indispensable for teaching anatomy to medical students. Ann. Anat. 2008; 190: 16-22.
  16. Turney B.W. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2007; 89: 104-7.
  17. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors: Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. 1st Ed. London, UK: General Medical Council. 28 p. URL: http://www.gmc-uk. org/Tomorrows_Doctors_1993.pdf_25397206.pdf [accessed 1 April 2012].
  18. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors: Regulating Doctors, Ensuring Good Medical Practice. 2nd Ed. London, UK: General Medical Council. 40 p. URL: http://www.gmc-uk.org/ TomorrowsDoctors_2003.pdf_39262074.pdf [accessed 1 April 2012].
  19. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors: Outcomes and Standards for Undergraduate Medical Education. Regulating Doctors, Ensuring Good Medical Practice. 3rd ed. London, UK: General Medical Council. 104 p. URL: http://www.gmc-uk.org/TomorrowsDoctors_2009. pdf_39260971.pdf [accessed 1 April 2011].
  20. Hyppola H., Kumpusalo E., Virjo I. et al. Improvement in undergraduate medical education: A 10-year follow up in Finland. Med. Teach. 2002; 24: 52-6.
  21. Watmough S.D., O'sullivan H., Taylor D.C. Graduates from a reformed undergraduate medical curriculum based on Tomorrow's Doctor evaluate the effectiveness of their curriculum 6 years after graduation through interviews. BMC Med. Educ. 2010; 10: 64.
  22. Turney B.W. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2007; 89: 104-7.
  23. Fitzgerald J.E., White M.J., Tang S.W. et al. Are we teaching sufficient anatomy at medical school? The opinions of newly qualified doctors. Clin. Anat. 2008; 21: 718-24.
  24. Mitchell R., Batty L. Undergraduate perspectives on the teaching and learning of anatomy. ANZ J. Surg. 2009; 79: 118-21.
  25. Ahmed K., Rowland S., Patel V. et al. Is the structure of anatomy curriculum adequate for safe medical practice? Surgeon 2010; 8: 318-24.
  26. Ahmed K., Rowland S., Patel V.M. et al. Specialist anatomy: Is the structure of teaching adequate? Surgeon 2011; 9: 312-7.
  27. Smith C.F., Mathias H.S. What impact does anatomy education have on clinical practice? Clin. Anat. 2011; 24: 113-9.
  28. Waterston S.W., Stewart I.J. Survey of clinicians' attitudes to the anatomical teaching and knowledge of medical students. Clin. Anat. 2005; 18: 380-4.
  29. Sugand K., Abrahams P., Khurana A. The Anatomy of Anatomy: A Review for Its Modernization. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2010; 3: 83-93.
  30. Drake R.L., McBride J.M., Pawlina W. An update on the status of anatomical sciences education in United States medical schools. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2014; 7: 321-5.
  31. Miller S.A., Perrotti W., Silverthorn D.U. et al. From college to clinic: Reasoning over memorization is key for understanding anatomy. Anat. Rec. (New Anat.) 2002; 269: 69-80.
  32. Hortsch M., Mangrulkar R.S. When Students Struggle with Gross Anatomy and Histology: A Strategy for Monitoring, Reviewing, and Promoting Student Academic Success in an Integrated Preclinical Medical Curriculum. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2015; 8: 478-83.
  33. Sugand K., Abrahams P., Khurana A. The Anatomy of Anatomy: A Review for Its Modernization. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2010; 3: 83-93.
  34. Быков В.Л. Преподавание биологических основ репродукции человека в современном курсе гистологии, эмбриологии и цитологии в медицинском вузе. Морфология 2016; 149(3): 42-42а.
  35. Fratt L. HIMSS: Can Dr. Watson help manage 1.8 zetabytes of medical data? CMIO.net, Providence, RI. 2012. URL: http://www. cmio.net/index. php?option5com articles&article532222 [accessed 29March 2012].).
  36. Dua H.S., Faraj L.A., Said D.G. et al. Human corneal anatomy redefined: a novel pre-Descemet's layer tDua's layer). Ophthalmology 2013; 120 (9): 1778-85.
  37. Claes S., Vereecke E., Maes M. et al. Anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. J. Anat. 2013; 223(4): 321-8.
  38. Louveau A., Smirnov I., Keyes T.J. et al. Structural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatic vessels. Nature 2015; 523(7560): 337-41.
  39. Шевлюк Н.Н., Стадников А.А. Роль лекционной формы преподавания морфологических дисциплин в медицинском вузе в условиях перестройки высшего медицинского образования. История и современные проблемы Морфология 2012; 6: 87-90.
  40. Сазонов С.В., Одинцова И.А., Ерофеева Л.М. Проблемы подготовки научно-педагогических кадров высшей квалификации по гистологии, эмбриологии, цитологии и преподавание этой учебной дисциплины в медицинских вузах. Морфологические ведомости, 2017; 1: 46-49.
  41. Sugand K., Abrahams P., Khurana A. The Anatomy of Anatomy: A Review for Its Modernization. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2010; 3: 83-93.
  42. Vogelstein B., Papadopoulos N., Velculescu V.E. et al. Cancer genome landscapes. Science 2013; 339: 1546-58.
  43. Yang Y., Muzny D.M., Reid J.G. et al. Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013; 369: 1502-11.
  44. Korf B.R., Berry A.B., Limson M. et al. Framework for development of physician competencies in genomic medicine: report of the Competencies Working Group of the Inter-Society Coordinating Committee for Physician Education in Genomics. Genetics in medicine 2014; 16: 804-9.
  45. Бойчук С.В., Исламов Р.Р., Улумбеков Э.Г., Челышев Ю.А. Гистология, эмбриология, цитология: учебник. Под ред. Э.Г. Улумбекова, Ю.А. Челышева. 4-е изд. перераб. и доп. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2016.
  46. http://www//ncbi-nlm.nih.gov./OMIM/, http://www. geneticdisorders.info/article/329051198/celebrity-dysmorphology/

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2017 Eco-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: 

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies