Ultrastructural comparative analysis of neuroendocrine tumors of pancreas



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Detection of ultrastructural distinctions of tumor cells and cell-to-cell cooperation in insulinomas and nonfunctioning neuroendocrine tumors of pancreas. Ultrastructural study of 38 insulinomas and 35 nonfunctioning neuroendocrine tumors of pancreas of the patients treated at Vishnevskiy Surgery Institute from 2010 to 2015. Insulinomas are characterized by high differentiation of intracellular organelles and specific secretory granules. In insulinomas the number of immature endocrine granules exceeded the number of mature granules. The tumor cells were often joined together and held with desmosomes ensuring very tight connection. Desmosome complexes were characterized by their extended length. Such ultrastructural changes were not followed by destruction of tumor cells. There was formation of specific syncytium-like structures consisting of cells connected by cytoplasmic channels with the common cytoplasm with cell organelles. In nonfunctioning tumors the most of the granules were distinguished by polymorphism and had no specific ultrastructure indicating the synthesized hormone. In large areas there were loss of plasmolemma integrity, up to its complete absence, which led to unification of cytoplasmic contents of the cells. Common junctions dominated in nonfunctioning tumors. Desmosomes were rare, poorly developed, and in the form of immature and reduced junctions. Complex cellular junctions are well developed in the cells, ensuring tight connection of tumor cells, reducing their invasive and metastatic potential. Nonfunctioning neuroendocrine tumors on the contrary are characterized by underdevelopment of cellular organelles and immaturity of secretory granules. Predominance of weak direct cell junctions, rupture of membranes of neighboring cells with simultaneous reduction of desmosomes facilitate the migration of individual tumor cells and formation of metastases.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

I. A Chekmareva

National medical research center of surgery named A.V. Vishnevsky

Email: chia236@mail.ru

O. V Paklina

National medical research center of surgery named A.V. Vishnevsky; S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital

E. N Gordienko

National medical research center of surgery named A.V. Vishnevsky; S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital

A. R Kaldarov

National medical research center of surgery named A.V. Vishnevsky

References

  1. Chidgey M., Dawson C. Desmosomes: a role in cancer? Br. J. Cancer 2007; 96: 1783-7.
  2. Runswick S.K., O'Hare M.J., Jones L. et al. Desmosomal adhesion regulates epithelial morphogenesis and cell positioning. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001; 3: 823-30.
  3. Tselepis C., Chidgey M., North A. et al. Desmosomal adhesion inhibits invasive behavior. PNAS USA 1998; 95: 8064-9.
  4. Ito T., Igarashi H., Nakamura K. et al. Epiemiological trends of pancreatic and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors in Japan: a nationwide survey analysis. J. Gastroenterol. 2015; 50(1): 58-64.
  5. Jensen R.T., Cadiot G., Brandi M.L. et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: functional pancreatic endocrine tumor syndromes. Neuroendocrinology 2012; 95: 98-119.
  6. Partelli S., Bartsch D.K., Capdevila J. et al. ENETS consensus guidelines for standard of care in neuroendocrine tumours: surgery for small intestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Neuroendocrinology 2017; 105: 255-65.
  7. Franko J., Feng W., Yip L. et al. Non-functional neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas: incidence, tumor biology, and outcomes in 2,158 patients. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2010; 14: 541-8.
  8. Fraenkel M., Kim M.K., Faggiano A. et al. Epidemiology of gastroen-teropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2012; 26: 691-703.
  9. Zhou G., Yang L., Gray A. et al. The role of desmosomes in carcinogenesis. OncoTargets Ther. 2017; 10: 4059-63.
  10. Tselepis C., Chidgey M., North A. et al. Desmosomal adhesion inhibits invasive behavior. PNAS USA 1998; 95(14): 8064-9.
  11. Aktary Z., Alaee M., Pasdar M. et al. Beyond cell-cell adhesion: Plakoglobin and the regulation of tumorigenesis and metastasis. Oncotarget 2017; 8(19): 32270-91.
  12. Chun M.G.H., Hanahan D. Genetic Deletion of the Desmosomal Component Desmoplakin Promotes Tumor Microinvasion in a Mouse Model of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinogenesis. PLoS Genet. 2010; 6(9): e1001120.
  13. Sawant S., Dongre H., Ahire C. et al. Alterations in desmosomal adhesion at protein and ultrastructure levels during the sequential progressive grades of human oral tumorigenesis. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2018; 126(4): 251-62.
  14. Гордиенко Е.Н., Чекмарева И.А., Паклина О.В. и др. Ультраструктурные особенности межклеточных контактов в инсулиномах поджелудочной железы. Гены и Клетки 2017; 12(2): 104-9.
  15. Mirancea G.V., Morosanu A.M., Carniciu S. et al. Relevant infrastructural alterations in a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: an insulinoma case. Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. 2014; 55: 659-68

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: 

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies