<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Genes &amp; Cells</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Genes &amp; Cells</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Гены и Клетки</trans-title></trans-title-group><trans-title-group xml:lang="zh"><trans-title>Genes and Cells</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-1829</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2500-2562</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Human Stem Cells Institute</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">121971</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23868/202012005</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Review Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Non-viral delivery of the BMP2 gene for bone regeneration</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Невирусная доставка гена BMP2 для регенерации костной ткани</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Nedorubova</surname><given-names>I. A</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Недорубова</surname><given-names>И. А</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>nedorubova.ia@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bukharova</surname><given-names>T. B</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бухарова</surname><given-names>Т. Б</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Vasilyev</surname><given-names>A. V</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Васильев</surname><given-names>А. В</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Goldshtein</surname><given-names>D. V</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гольдштейн</surname><given-names>Д. В</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kulakov</surname><given-names>A. A</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кулаков</surname><given-names>А. А</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Research Centre for Medical Genetics</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Медико-генетический научный центр им. академика Н.П. Бочкова</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Central Research Institute of Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр «Центральный научно-исследовательский институт стоматологии и челюстно-лицевой хирургии»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020-12-10" publication-format="electronic"><day>10</day><month>12</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 15, NO4 (2020)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 15, №4 (2020)</issue-title><fpage>33</fpage><lpage>39</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-01-16"><day>16</day><month>01</month><year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2020, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2020, Эко-Вектор</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Эко-Вектор</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://genescells.ru/2313-1829/article/view/121971">https://genescells.ru/2313-1829/article/view/121971</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Gene-activated bone grafts and substitutes are promising tools for the bone defect healing, which are capable to induce prolonged production of growth factors with a therapeutic effect at physiological concentrations. Non-viral methods of delivering plasmid constructs with target genes are the safest for clinical use, but their efficiency is lower in comparison with viral vectors. To solve the problem of plasmid delivery into cells, some systems with a high transfection capacity and ensure sufficient cell viability are being developed. Moreover, there are different approaches to improve the level of expression of target genes and targeted delivery to the bone defect in order to achieve local therapeutic concentrations. This review considers approaches which are aimed to increase the efficiency of bone tissue regeneration methods based on non-viral delivery systems for osteoinduction genes using the example of the bone morphogenetic protein-2 gene.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Ген-активированные костно-пластические материалы являются перспективным инструментом для заживления костных дефектов, они способны индуцировать пролонгированную продукцию факторов роста с терапевтическим действием в физиологических концентрациях. Наиболее безопасны для клинического применения невирусные способы доставки плазмидных конструкций с целевыми генами, но их эффективность ниже по сравнению с вирусными векторами. Для решения проблемы доставки плазмид в клетки ведется разработка систем с высокой трансфицирующей активностью, обеспечивающих достаточную жизнеспособность клеток. Кроме того, используются подходы для повышения уровня экспрессии целевых генов и их адресной доставки в зону костного дефекта с целью достижения локальных терапевтических концентраций. В настоящем обзоре рассмотрены подходы, направленные на повышение эффективности методов регенерации костной ткани, основанных на невирусных системах доставки генов индукторов остеогенеза на примере гена костного морфогенетического белка-2 - BMP-2.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>BMP-2</kwd><kwd>gene-activated materials</kwd><kwd>BMP-2</kwd><kwd>non-viral delivery systems</kwd><kwd>bone tissue regeneration</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>ген-активированные материалы</kwd><kwd>невирусные системы доставки</kwd><kwd>регенерация костной ткани</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Kumar P., Vinitha B., Fathima G. Bone grafts in dentistry. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2013; 5(5): 125-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Деев Р.В., Дробышев А.Ю., Бозо И.Я. Ординарные и активированные остеопластические материалы. Вестник травматологии и ортопедии имени Н.Н. Приорова 2015; 1: 51-69.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Carreira A.C., Zambuzzi W.F., Rossi M.C. et al. Bone morphogenetic proteins: promising molecules for bone healing, bioengineering, and regenerative medicine. Vitam. Horm. 2015; 99: 293-322.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Schmidt-Bleek K., Willie B.M., Schwabe P. et al. BMPs in bone regeneration: Less is more effective, a paradigm-shift. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2016; 27: 141-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Salazar V.S., Gamer L.W., Rosen V. BMP signalling in skeletal development, disease and repair. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2016; 12(4): 203-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Mi L.Z., Brown C.T., Gao Y. et al. Structure of bone morphogenetic protein 9 procomplex. PNAS USA 2015; 112(12): 3710-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Spinella-Jaegle S., Roman-Roman S., Faucheu C. et al. Opposite effects of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and transforming growth factor-beta1 on osteoblast differentiation. Bone 2001; 29(4): 323-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Chen G., Deng C., Li Y.P. TGF-p and BMP signaling in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2012; 8(2): 272-88.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang H., Bradley A. Mice deficient for BMP2 are nonviable and have defects in amnion/chorion and cardiac development. Development 1996; 122(10): 2977-86.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Кузнецова В.С., Васильев А.В., Бухарова Т.Б. и др. Безопасность и эффективность применения морфогенетических белков кости 2 и 7 в стоматологии. Стоматология 2019; 98(1): 64-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Govender S., Csimma C., Genant H.K. et al. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for treatment of open tibial fractures: a prospective, controlled, randomized study of four hundred and fifty patients. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2002; 84: 2123-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Cicciu M., Herford A.S., Cicciu D. et al. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 promote and stabilize hard and soft tissue healing for large mandibular new bone reconstruction defects. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2014; 25(3): 860-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Boyne P.J., Lilly L.C., Marx R.E. et al. De novo bone induction by recombinant human bone morphogenetic Protein-2 (rhbmp-2) in maxillary sinus floor augmentation. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2005; 63(12): 1693-707.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Axelrad T.W., Steen B., Lowenberg D.W. et al. Heterotopic ossification after the use of commercially available recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins in four patients. J. of Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2008; 90(12): 1617-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Carragee E.J., Hurwitz E.L., Weiner B.K. A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned. Spine J. 2011; 11(6): 471-91.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Meisel H.J., Schnoring M., Hohaus C. et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2. Eur. Spine J. 2008; 17(12): 1735-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>McClellan J.W., Mulconrey D.S., Forbes R.J. et al. Vertebral bone resorption after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2). J. Spinal Disord. Tech. 2006; 19(7): 483-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Cooper G.S., Kou T.D. Risk of cancer after lumbar fusion surgery with recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 (rh-BMP-2). Spine J. 2013; 38: 1862-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Kelly M.P., Savage J.W., Bentzen S.M. et al. Cancer Risk from Bone Morphogenetic Protein Exposure in Spinal Arthrodesis. J. Joint Surg. Am. 2014; 96(17): 1417-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Carragee E.J., Chu G., Rohatgi R. et al. Cancer risk after use of recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 for spinal arthrodesis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2013; 95: 1537-45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Skovrlj B., Koehler S.M., Anderson P.A. et al. Association between bmp-2 and carcinogenicity. Spine J. 2015; 40(23): 1862-71.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Woo E.J. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: adverse events reported to the manufacturer and user facility device experience database. Spine J. 2012; 12: 894-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Kofron M.D., Laurencin C.T. Bone Tissue Engineering by Gene Delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2006; 58: 555-76.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Park S.Y., Kim K.H., Kim S. et al. BMP-2 Gene Delivery-Based Bone Regeneration in Dentistry. Pharmaceutics 2019; 11(8): 393.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Kolk A., Boskov M., Haidari S. et al. Comparative analysis of bone regeneration behavior using recombinant human BMP-2 versus plasmid DNA of BMP-2. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2019; 107(1): 163-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Abbas A.O., Donovan M.D., Salem A.K. Formulating poly(lactide-co-glycolide) particles for plasmid DNA delivery. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008; 97(7): 2448-61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Raftery R.M., Walsh D.P., Castano I.M. et al. Delivering nucleic-acid based nanomedicines on biomaterial scaffolds for orthopedic tissue repair: challenges, progress and future perspectives. Adv. Mater. 2016; 28(27): 5447-69.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Jin W., Lin D., Nguyen A.H. et al. Transfection of difficult-to-transfect rat primary cortical neurons with magnetic nanoparticles. J. Biomed. Nano-technol. 2018; 14(9): 1654-64.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Figueroa E., Bugga P., Asthana V. et al. A mechanistic investigation exploring the differential transfection efficiencies between the easy-to-transfect SK-BR3 and difficult-to-transfect CT26 cell lines. J. Nanobiotechnology 2017; 15(1): 36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Смирнихина С.А. Экспрессия генов, трансфицированных в мезенхимные стволовые клетки человека. Гены и клетки 2010; 5(4): 16-23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>de Carvalho T.G., Pellenz F.M., Laureano A. et al. A simple protocol for transfecting human mesenchymal stem cells. Biotechnol. Lett. 2018; 40(3): 617-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Wu G.P., He X.C., Hu C.B. et al. Effect of electroporation-mediated transfecting recombinant plasmid pIRES-hBMP-2-hVEGF165 on mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2012; 69: 316-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Aslan H., Zilberman Y., Arbeli V. et al. Nucleofection-based ex vivo nonviral gene delivery to human stem cells as a platform for tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng. 2006; 12: 877-89.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Kawai M., Kataoka Y.H., Sonobe J. et al. Non-surgical model for alveolar bone regeneration by bone morphogenetic protein-2/7 Gene Therapy. J. Periodontol. 2018; 89: 85-92.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Feichtinger G.A., Hofmann A.T., Slezak P. et al. Sonoporation increases therapeutic efficacy of inducible and constitutive BMP2/7 in vivo gene delivery. Hum. Gene Ther. Methods 2014; 25(1): 57-71.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Hamm A., Krott N., Breibach I. et al. Effcient transfection method for primary cells. Tissue Eng. 2002; 8: 235-45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Зарницын В.Г., Праузниц М.Р., Чизмаджев Ю.А. Физические методы переноса нуклеиновых кислот в ткани и клетки. Биологические Мембраны: Журнал мембранной и клеточной биологии 2004; 21(5): 355-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Qadir A., Gao Y., Suryaji P. et al. Non-viral delivery system and targeted bone disease therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019; 20(3): 565.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Curtin C.M., Cunniffe G.M., Lyons F.G. et al. Innovative collagen nano-hydroxyapatite scaffolds offer a highly efficient non-viral gene delivery platform for stem cell-mediated bone formation. Adv. Mater. 2012; 24(6): 749-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Yang X., Walboomers X.F., Van den Dolder J. et al. Non-viral bone morphogenetic protein 2 transfection of rat dental pulp stem cells using calcium phosphate nanoparticles as carriers. Tissue Eng. Part A 2008; 14(1): 71-81.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Conner S.D., Schmid S.L. Regulated portals of entry into the cell. Nature 2003; 422: 37-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Михеев А.А., Шмендель Е.В., Жестовская Е.С. и др. Катионные липосомы как средства доставки нуклеиновых кислот. Тонкие химические технологии 2020; 15(1): 7-27.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Slivac I., Guay D., Mangion M. et al. Non-viral nucleic acid delivery methods. Expert Opin. Biol. Th. 2016; 17(1): 105-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Paidikondala M., Kadekar S., Varghese O. Innovative strategy for 3D transfection of primary human stem cells with BMP-2 expressing plasmid DNA: A clinically translatable strategy for ex vivo gene therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018; 20(1): 56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Wegman F., Bijenhof A., Schuijff L. et al. Osteogenic differentiation as a result of BMP-2 plasmid DNA based gene therapy in vitro and in vivo. Eur. Cells Mater. 2011; 21: 230-42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Joenoes H., Yuniastuti M., Bachtiar E.W. et al. Construction of recombinant plasmid pcDNA3.1/BMP-2 and its involvement in differentiation of human dental pulp-derived cells into an odontoblastic lineage. MJHR 2009; 13(1): 5-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Tang Y., Tang W., Lin Y. et al. Combination of bone tissue engineering and BMP-2 gene transfection promotes bone healing in osteoporotic rats. Cell Biol. Int. 2008; 32: 1150-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Park J., Ries J., Gelse K. et al. Bone regeneration in critical size defects by cell-mediated BMP-2 gene transfer: a comparison of adenoviral vectors and liposomes. Gene Ther. 2003; 10: 1089-98.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Yang S., May S. Release of cationic polymer-DNA complexes from the endosome: A theoretical investigation of the proton sponge hypothesis. J. Chem. Phys. 2008; 129(18): 185105.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Osada K. Development of functional polyplex micelles for systemic gene therapy. Polym. J. 2014; 46(8): 469-75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Scheller E.L., Krebsbach P.H. Gene therapy: design and prospects for craniofacial regeneration. J. Dent. Res. 2009; 88(7): 585-96.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Dang J., Leong K. Natural polymers for gene delivery and tissue engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2006; 58(4): 487-99.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Kichler A., Leborgne C., Coeytaux E. et al. Polyethylenimine-mediated gene delivery: a mechanistic study. J. Gene Med. 2001; 3: 135-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Wang Y., You C., Wei R. et al. Modification of human umbilical cord blood stem cells using polyethylenimine combined with modified TAT peptide to enhance BMP-2 production. Biomed Res. Int. 2017: 1-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Lee J.E., Yin Y., Lim S.Y. et al. Enhanced transfection of human mesenchymal stem cells using a hyaluronic acid/calcium phosphate hybrid gene delivery system. Polymers 2019; 11(5): 798.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>D’Mello S., Atluri K., Geary S.M. et al. Bone regeneration using gene-activated matrices. AAPS J. 2016; 19(1): 43-53.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Pandey A.P., Sawant K.K. Polyethylenimine: A versatile, multifunctional non-viral vector for nucleic acid delivery. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2016; 68: 904-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Lee Y.H., Wu H.C., Yeh C.W. et al. Enzyme-crosslinked gene-activated matrix for the induction of mesenchymal stem cells in osteochondral tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2017; 63: 210-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Atluri K., Seabold D., Hong L. et al. Nanoplex-mediated codelivery of fibroblast growth factor and bone morphogenetic protein genes promotes osteogenesis in human adipocyte-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Mol. Pharm. 2015; 12(8): 3032-42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Qiao C., Zhang K., Jin H. et al. Using poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres to encapsulate plasmid of bone morphogenetic protein 2/ polyethylenimine nanoparticles to promote bone formation in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Nanomed. 2013; 8: 2985-95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Yue J., Wu J., Liu D. et al. BMP2 gene delivery to bone mesenchymal stem cell by chitosan-g-PEI nonviral vector. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 201 5; 10(1): 203.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Xu X., Qiu S., Zhang Y. et al. PELA microspheres with encapsulated arginine-chitosan/pBMP-2 nanoparticles induce pBMP-2 controlled-release, transfected osteoblastic progenitor cells, and promoted osteogenic differentiation. Artif. Cells Nanomed. B. 2016; 45(2): 330-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Raftery R.M., Mencia-Castano I., Sperger S. et al. Delivery of the improved BMP-2-Advanced plasmid DNA within a gene-activated scaffold accelerates mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis and critical size defect repair. J. Control. Release 2018; 283: 20-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>Keeney M., Chung M.T., Zielins E.R. et al. Scaffold-mediated BMP-2 minicircle DNA delivery accelerated bone repair in a mouse critical-size calvarial defect model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2016; 104: 2099-107.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>Chen W., Li W., Xu K. et al. Functionalizing titanium surface with PAMAM dendrimer and human BMP2 gene via layer-by-layer assembly for enhanced osteogenesis. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2017; 106(3): 706-17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><mixed-citation>Santos J.L., Oramas E., Pego A.P. et al. Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells using PAMAM dendrimers as gene delivery vectors. J. Control. Release 2009; 134(2): 141-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><mixed-citation>Nedorubova I.A., Bukharova T.B., Zagoskin Y.D. et al. Development of osteoplastic material impregnated with plasmid encoding bone morphogenetic protein-2. Biotekhnologiya 2020; 36(4): 59-64.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B68"><label>68.</label><mixed-citation>Loozen L.D., Kruyt M.C., Kragten A.H.M. et al. BMP-2 gene delivery in cell-loaded and cell-free constructs for bone regeneration. PLoS One 2019; 14(7): e0220028.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B69"><label>69.</label><mixed-citation>Qin J.Y., Zhang L., Clift K.L. et al. Systematic comparison of constitutive promoters and the doxycycline-inducible promoter. PLoS One 2010; 5(5): e10611.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B70"><label>70.</label><mixed-citation>Hacobian A.R.A., Posa-Markaryan K., Sperger S. et al. Improved osteogenic vector for non-viral gene therapy. Eur. Cells Mater. 2016; 31: 191-204.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B71"><label>71.</label><mixed-citation>Kuttappan S., Anitha A., Minsha M.G. et al. BMP2 expressing genetically engineered mesenchymal stem cells on composite fibrous scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration in segmental defects. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018; 85: 239-48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B72"><label>72.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang W., Tsurushima H., Oyane A. et al. BMP-2 gene-fibronectin-apatite composite layer enhances bone formation. J. Biomed. Sci. 2011; 18(1): 62.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B73"><label>73.</label><mixed-citation>Endo M., Kuroda S., Kondo H. et al. bone regeneration by modified gene-activated matrix: effectiveness in segmental tibial defects in rats. Tissue Eng. 2006; 12(3): 489-97.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B74"><label>74.</label><mixed-citation>Li H., Ji Q., Chen X. et al. Accelerated bony defect healing based on chitosan thermosensitive hydrogel scaffolds embedded with chitosan nanoparticles for the delivery of BMP2 plasmid DNA. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2016; 105(1): 265-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B75"><label>75.</label><mixed-citation>Kolk A., Tischer T., Koch C. et al. A novel nonviral gene delivery tool of BMP-2 for the reconstitution of critical-size bone defects in rats. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2016; 104: 2441-55.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B76"><label>76.</label><mixed-citation>Kaipel M., Schutzenberger S., Hofmann A.T. et al. Evaluation of fibrin-based gene-activated matrices for BMP2/7 plasmid codelivery in a rat nonunion model. Int. Orthop. 2014; 38(12): 2607-13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B77"><label>77.</label><mixed-citation>Park J., Lutz R., Felszeghy E. et al. The effect on bone regeneration of a liposomal vector to deliver BMP-2 gene to bone grafts in peri-implant bone defects. Biomaterials 2007; 28(17): 2772-82.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B78"><label>78.</label><mixed-citation>Khorsand B., Nicholson N., Do A.V. et al. Regeneration of bone using nanoplex delivery of FGF-2 and BMP-2 genes in diaphyseal long bone radial defects in a diabetic rabbit model. J. Control. Release 2017; 248: 53-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B79"><label>79.</label><mixed-citation>Logovskaya L.V., Bukharova T.B., Volkov A.V. et al. Induction of osteogenic differentiation of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells from human adipose tissue. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2013; 155(1): 145-50.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B80"><label>80.</label><mixed-citation>Perez J.R., Kouroupis D., Li D.J. et al. Tissue engineering and cell-based therapies for fractures and bone defects. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2018; 6: 105.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B81"><label>81.</label><mixed-citation>Krebs M.D., Salter E., Chen E. et al. Calcium phosphate-DNA nanoparticle gene delivery from alginate hydrogels inducesin vivoosteogen-esis. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2010; 92(3): 1131-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B82"><label>82.</label><mixed-citation>Lu K., Zeng D., Zhang Y. et al. BMP-2 gene modified canine bMSCs promote ectopic bone formation mediated by a nonviral PEI derivative. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2011; 39(6): 1829-39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B83"><label>83.</label><mixed-citation>Rose L.C., Kucharski C., Uludag H. Protein expression following nonviral delivery of plasmid DNA coding for basic FGF and BMP-2 in a rat ectopic model. Biomaterials 2012; 33(11): 3363-74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B84"><label>84.</label><mixed-citation>Vural A.C., Odabas S., Korkusuz P. et al. Cranial bone regeneration via BMP-2 encoding mesenchymal stem cells. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2016; 45(3): 544-50.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B85"><label>85.</label><mixed-citation>Gonzalez-Fernandez T., Rathan S., Hobbs C. et al. Pore-forming bioinks to enable spatio-temporally defined gene delivery in bioprinted tissues. J. Control. Release 2019; 301: 13-27.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B86"><label>86.</label><mixed-citation>Steinert A.F., Noth U., Tuan R.S. Concepts in gene therapy for cartilage repair. Injury 2008; 39 Suppl 1: 97-113.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B87"><label>87.</label><mixed-citation>Бозо И.Я., Рожков С.И., Комлев В.С. и др. Сравнительная оценка биологической активности ген-активированных остеопластических материалов из октакальциевого фосфата и плазмидных ДНК, несущих гены VEGF и SDF: часть 2 - in vivo. Гены и клетки 2017; 12(4): 39-46.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
