<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Genes &amp; Cells</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Genes &amp; Cells</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Гены и Клетки</trans-title></trans-title-group><trans-title-group xml:lang="zh"><trans-title>Genes and Cells</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-1829</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2500-2562</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Human Stem Cells Institute</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">120579</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23868/gc120579</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Review Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The phenomenon of X chromosome inactivation and human diseases</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ФЕНОМЕН ИНАКТИВАЦИИ Х-ХРОМОСОМЫ И ЗАБОЛЕВАНИЯ ЧЕЛОВЕКА</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shevchenko</surname><given-names>A. I</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шевченко</surname><given-names>А. И</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>epigene@bionet.nsc.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБНУ «Федеральный исследовательский центр Институт цитологии и генетики СО РАН»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБНУ «Институт химической биологии и фундаментальной медицины СО РАН»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff3"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт патологии кровообращения имени академика Е.Н. Мешалкина» Министерства здравоохранения РФ</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2016-06-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>06</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 11, NO2 (2016)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 11, №2 (2016)</issue-title><fpage>61</fpage><lpage>69</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-01-05"><day>05</day><month>01</month><year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2016, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2016, Эко-Вектор</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Эко-Вектор</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://genescells.ru/2313-1829/article/view/120579">https://genescells.ru/2313-1829/article/view/120579</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In early development, one of the two X chromosomes is randomly inactivated in each somatic cell of female embryos. As a result, women are mosaics that means about a half of their cells bear the active X chromosome inherited from the father, while the genes of the maternally inherited X chromosome are expressed in the other half. Disturbance in the inactivation process during embryogenesis leads to fetal death. Reactivation of the inactive X chromosome in female cells can cause a number of diseases, including cancer and autoimmune disorders. Changes in randomness of X-chromosome inactivation and skewed choice of one of the X-chromosomes for inactivation can influence clinical manifestations of about 400 diseases associated with mutations in X-linked genes. The phenomenon of X chromosome inactivation is also an important issue for successful application of human pluripotent stem cells in biomedical research and regenerative medicine.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>На ранней стадии развития у эмбрионов женского пола в каждой соматической клетке случайным образом инактивируется одна из двух Х-хромосом. В результате инактивации формируется мозаичный организм, приблизительно в половине клеток которого активна Х-хромосома, унаследованная от отца, тогда как в оставшейся половине экспрессируются гены Х-хромосомы, полученной от матери. Нарушение процесса инактивации в эмбриогенезе приводит к гибели плода. Реактивация неактивной Х-хромосомы в клетках женщин является причиной развития ряда заболеваний, включая онкологические и аутоиммунные. Изменения случайного характера инактивации Х-хромосомы и предпочтительный выбор для инактивации одной из них способны оказывать влияние на клинические проявления около 400 заболеваний, связанных с мутациями X-сцепленных генов. Феномен инактивации Х-хромосомы необходимо учитывать при работе с плюрипотентными стволовыми клетками человека для их успешного применения в биомедицинских исследованиях и использования для целей регенеративной медицины.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>X-chromosome inactivation</kwd><kwd>XIST</kwd><kwd>human diseases caused by disturbances in dosage of X-linked genes</kwd><kwd>pluripotent stem cells</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>инактивация Х-хромосомы</kwd><kwd>ген XIST</kwd><kwd>болезни человека при нарушении дозы Х-сцепленных генов</kwd><kwd>плюрипотентные стволовые клетки</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Lyon M.F. X-chromosome inactivation and human genetic disease. Acta Paediatr. Suppl. 2002; 91(439): 107-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Migeon B.R. X inactivation, female mosaicism, and sex differences in renal diseases. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008; 19(11): 2052-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Vallot C., Huret C., Lesecque Y. et al. XACT, a long noncoding transcript coating the active X chromosome in human pluripotent cells. Nat. Genet. 2013; 45(3): 239-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Vallot C., Ouimette J.F., Makhlouf M. et al. Erosion of X Chromosome Inactivation in Human Pluripotent Cells Initiates with XACT Coating and Depends on a Specific Heterochromatin Landscape. Cell Stem Cell 2015; 16(5): 533-46.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Chadwick B.P., Willard H.F. Multiple spatially distinct types of facultative heterochromatin on the human inactive X chromosome. PNAS USA 2004; 101(50): 17450-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Carrel L., Willard H.F. X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females. Nature 2005; 434(7031): 400-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Dementyeva E.V., Shevchenko A.I., Zakian S.M. X-chromosome upregulation and inactivation: two sides of the dosage compensation mechanism in mammals. Bioessays 2009; 31(1): 21-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Schluth C., Cossée M., Girard-Lemaire F. et al. Phenotype in X chromosome rearrangements: pitfalls of X inactivation study. Pathol. Biol. 2007; 55(1): 29-36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Schmidt M., Du Sart D. Functional disomies of the X chromosome influence the cell selection and hence the X inactivation pattern in females with balanced X-autosome translocations: a review of 122 cases. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1992; 42(2): 161-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Migeon B.R., Luo S., Jani M., Jeppesen P. The severe phenotype of females with tiny ring X chromosomes is associated with inability of these chromosomes to undergo X inactivation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1994; 55(3): 497-504.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Leppig K.A., Disteche C.M. Ring X and other structural X chromosome abnormalities: X inactivation and phenotype. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2001; 19(2): 147-57.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Van den Veyver I.B. Skewed X inactivation in X-linked disorders. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2001; 19(2): 183-91.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Belmont J.W. Genetic control of X inactivation and processes leading to X-inactivation skewing. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1996; 58(6): 1101-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Pegoraro E., Whitaker J., Mowery-Rushton P. et al., Familial skewed X inactivation: a molecular trait associated with high spontaneous-abortion rate maps to Xq28. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997; 61(1): 160-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Pugacheva E.M., Tiwari V.K., Abdullaev Z. et al. Familial cases of point mutations in the XIST promoter reveal a correlation between CTCF binding and pre-emptive choices of X chromosome inactivation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005; 14(7): 953-65.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Plenge R.M., Hendrich B.D., Schwartz C. et al. A promoter mutation in the XIST gene in two unrelated families with skewed X-chromosome inactivation. Nat. Genet. 1997; 17(3): 353-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Naumova A.K., Plenge R.M., Bird L.M. et al. Heritability of X chromosome-inactivation phenotype in a large family. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1996; 58(6): 1111-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Invernizzi P., Pasini S., Selmi C. et al. Female predominance and X chromosome defects in autoimmune diseases. J. Autoimmun. 2009; 33(1): 12-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Scofield R.H., Bruner G.R., Namjou B. et al. Klinefelter's syndrome (47,XXY) in male systemic lupus erythematosus patients: support for the notion of a gene-dose effect from the X chromosome. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 58(8): 2511-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Sawalha A.H., Harley J.B., Scofield R.H. Autoimmunity and Klinefelter's syndrome: when men have two X chromosomes. J. Autoimmun. 2009; 33(1): 31-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Forsdyke D.R. X chromosome reactivation perturbs intracellular self/not-self discrimination. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2009; 87(7): 525-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Hitchcock D.I. Proteins and the Donnan equilibrium. Physiol. Rev. 1924; 4(3): 505-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Kurbel S. Are extracellular osmolality and sodium concentration determined by Donnan effects of intracellular protein charges and of pumped sodium? J. Theor. Biol. 2008; 252(4): 769-72.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Brooks W. A commentary on types of DNA methylation status of the interspersed repetitive sequences for LINE-1, Alu, HERV-E and HERV-K in the neutrophils from systemic lupus erythematosus patients and healthy controls. J. Hum. Genet. 2014; 59(4): 174-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Brooks W.H., Renaudineau Y. Epigenetics and autoimmune diseases: the X chromosome-nucleolus nexus. Front Genet. 2015; 6: 22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Kaufman K.M., Zhao J., Kelly J.A. et al. Fine mapping of Xq28: both MECP2 and IRAK1 contribute to risk for systemic lupus erythematosus in multiple ancestral groups. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013; 72(3): 437-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Sawalha A.H. Overexpression of methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 and autoimmunity: evidence from MECP2 duplication syndrome, lupus, MECP2 transgenic and Mecp2 deficient mice. Lupus 2013; 22(9): 870-2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Banchereau J., Bazan F., Blanchard D. et al. The CD40 antigen and its ligand. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 1994; 12: 881-922.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Lian X., Xiao R., Hu X. et al. DNA demethylation of CD40l in CD4+ T cells from women with systemic sclerosis: a possible explanation for female susceptibility. Arthritis Rheum. 2012; 64(7): 2338-45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Dekker R.J., van Soest S., Fontijn R.D. et al. Prolonged fluid shear stress induces a distinct set of endothelial cell genes, most specifically lung Krüppel-like factor (KLF2). Blood 2002; 100(5): 1689-98.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Kim H.P., Leonard W.J. CREB/ATF-dependent T cell receptor-induced FoxP3 gene expression: a role for DNA methylation. J. Exp. Med. 2007; 204(7): 1543-51.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Higgins M.E., Claremont M., Major J.E. et al. CancerGenes: a gene selection resource for cancer genome projects. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35(Database issue): D721-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Spatz A., Borg C., Feunteun J. X-chromosome genetics and human cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2004; 4(8): 617-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Richardson A.L., Wang Z.C., De Nicolo A. et al. X chromosomal abnormalities in basal-like human breast cancer. Cancer Cell 2006; 9(2): 121-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Pageau G.J., Hall L.L., Ganesan S. et al. The disappearing Barr body in breast and ovarian cancers. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2007; 7(8): 628-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Rogner U.C., Wilke K., Steck E. et al. The melanoma antigen gene (MAGE) family is clustered in the chromosomal band Xq28. Genomics 1995; 29(3): 725-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Shriver S.P., Bourdeau H.A., Gubish C.T. et al. Sex-specific expression of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor: relationship to smoking history and risk of lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2000; 92(1): 24-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Sudbrak R., Wieczorek G., Nuber U.A. et al. X chromosome-specific cDNA arrays: identification of genes that escape from X-inactivation and other applications. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001; 10(1): 77-83.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Cheng.PC., Gosewehr J.A., Kim T.M. et al. Potential role of the inactivated X chromosome in ovarian epithelial tumor development. JNCI J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 1996; 88(8): 510-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Piao Z., Lee K.S., Kim H. et al. Identification of novel deletion regions on chromosome arms 2q and 6p in breast carcinomas by amplotype analysis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2001; 30(2): 113-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Wang N., Cedrone E., Skuse G.R. et al. Two identical active X chromosomes in human mammary carcinoma cells. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1990; 46(2): 271-80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Muleris M., Dutrillaux A.M., Salmon R.J., Dutrillaux B. Sex chromosomes in a series of 79 colorectal cancers: Replication pattern, numerical, and structural changes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1990; 1(3): 221-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Dutrillaux B., Muleris M., Seureau M.G. Imbalance of sex chromosomes, with gain of early-replicating X, in human solid tumors. Int. J. Cancer 1986; 38(4): 475-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Terracciano L.M., Bernasconi B., Ruck P. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of hepatoblastoma reveals high frequency of X-chromosome gains and similarities between epithelial and stromal components. Hum. Pathol. 2003; 34(9): 864-71.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Kokalj-Vokac N., Saint-Ruf C., Lefrançois D. et al. A t(X;15) (q23;q25) with Xq reactivation in a lymphoblastoid cell line from Fanconi anemia. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1991; 57(1): 11-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Jones C., Booth C., Rita D. et al. Bilateral retinoblastoma in a male patient with an X; 13 translocation: evidence for silencing of the RB1 gene by the spreading of X inactivation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997; 60(6): 1558-62.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Hake S.B., Xiao A., Allis C.D. Linking the epigenetic "language" of covalent histone modifications to cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2004; 90(4): 761-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Lou Z., Minter-Dykhouse K., Chen J. BRCA1 participates in DNA decatenation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2005;12(7): 589-93.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Jäger N., Schlesner M., Jones D.T.W. et al. Hypermutation of the inactive X chromosome is a frequent event in cancer. Cell 2013; 155(3): 567-81.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Medvedev S.P., Shevchenko A.I., Zakian S.M. Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: Problems and Advantages when Applying them in Regenerative Medicine. Acta Naturae 2010; 2(2): 18-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Silva S.S., Rowntree R.K., Mekhoubad S., Lee J.T. X-chromosome inactivation and epigenetic fluidity in human embryonic stem cells. PNAS USA 2008; 105(12): 4820-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Anguera M.C., Sadreyev R., Zhang Z. et al. Molecular signatures of human induced pluripotent stem cells highlight sex differences and cancer genes. Cell Stem Cell 2012; 11(1): 75-90.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Shen Y., Matsuno Y., Fouse S.D. et al. X-inactivation in female human embryonic stem cells is in a nonrandom pattern and prone to epigenetic alterations. PNAS USA 2008; 105(12): 4709-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Hall L.L., Byron M., Butler J. et al. X-inactivation reveals epigenetic anomalies in most hESC but identifies sublines that initiate as expected. J. Cell Physiol. 2008; 216(2): 445-52.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Mekhoubad S., Bock C., de Boer A.S. et al. Erosion of dosage compensation impacts human iPSC disease modeling. Cell Stem Cell 2012; 10(5): 595-609.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Tomoda K., Takahashi K., Leung K. et al. Derivation conditions impact X-inactivation status in female human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2012; 11(1): 91-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Hanna J., Cheng A.W., Saha K. et al. Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs. PNAS USA 2010; 107(20): 9222-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Ware C.B., Wang L., Mecham B.H. et al. Histone deacetylase inhibition elicits an evolutionarily conserved self-renewal program in embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2009; 4(4): 359-69.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Hasegawa Y., Tang D., Takahashi N. et al. CCL2 enhances pluripotency of human induced pluripotent stem cells by activating hypoxia related genes. Sci. Rep. 2014; doi:10.1038/srep05228.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Lengner C.J., Gimelbrant A.A., Erwin J.A. et al. Derivation of pre-X inactivation human embryonic stem cells under physiological oxygen concentrations. Cell 2010; 141(5): 872-83.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Shumaker D.K., Dechat T., Kohlmaier A. et al. Mutant nuclear lamin A leads to progressive alterations of epigenetic control in premature aging. PNAS USA 2006; 103(23): 8703-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Huang K.-C., Rao P.H., Lau C.C. et al. Relationship of XIST expression and responses of ovarian cancer to chemotherapy. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2002; 1(10): 769-76.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Ji B., Higa K.K., Kelsoe J.R., Zhou X. Over-expression of XIST, the master gene for X chromosome inactivation, in females with major affective disorders. EBioMedicine 2015; 2(8): 907-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>Jiang J., Jing Y., Cost G.J. et al. Translating dosage compensation to trisomy 21. Nature 2013; 500(7462): 296-300.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>Tchieu J., Kuoy E., Chin M.H. et al. Female human iPSCs retain an inactive X chromosome. Cell Stem Cell 2010; 7(3): 329-42.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
