<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Genes &amp; Cells</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Genes &amp; Cells</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Гены и Клетки</trans-title></trans-title-group><trans-title-group xml:lang="zh"><trans-title>Genes and Cells</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-1829</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2500-2562</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Human Stem Cells Institute</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">120575</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23868/gc120575</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Review Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Editing of DNA epigenetic modifications</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>РЕДАКТИРОВАНИЕ ЭПИГЕНЕТИЧЕСКИХ МОДИФИКАЦИЙ ДНК</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Grin</surname><given-names>I. R</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Грин</surname><given-names>И. Р</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Petrova</surname><given-names>D. V</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Петрова</surname><given-names>Д. В</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Zharkov</surname><given-names>D. O</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Жарков</surname><given-names>Д. О</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБНУ «Институт химической биологии и фундаментальной медицины СО РАН»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">National Research University Novosibirsk State University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Новосибирский национальный исследовательский государственный университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2016-06-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>06</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 11, NO2 (2016)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 11, №2 (2016)</issue-title><fpage>53</fpage><lpage>60</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-01-05"><day>05</day><month>01</month><year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2016, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2016, Эко-Вектор</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Эко-Вектор</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://genescells.ru/2313-1829/article/view/120575">https://genescells.ru/2313-1829/article/view/120575</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Геномное редактирование в последние годы прочно вошло в арсенал методов молекулярной и клеточной биологии. Однако у высших эукариот огромную роль в формировании фенотипа клеток и организма в целом играет также состояние эпигенома - системы ковалентных модификаций ДНК и связанных с ней белков, регулирующих экспрессию генов. Методы редактирования эпигенома только начинают появляться, и в сочетании с технологиями геномного редактирования должны обеспечить более надежный контроль состояния изменяемых клеток. В обзоре освещены механизмы метилирования и активного деметилирования ДНК в клетках высших организмов и способы их применения для направленного изменения состояния эпигенома.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Cas9</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>эпигенетика</kwd><kwd>5-метилцитозин</kwd><kwd>ДНК-метилтрансферазы</kwd><kwd>оксидативные деметилазы</kwd><kwd>репарация ДНК</kwd><kwd>цинковые пальцы</kwd><kwd>TAL-эффекторы</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Lee T.-f., Zhai J., Meyers B.C. Conservation and divergence in eukaryotic DNA methylation. PNAS USA 2010; 107: 9027-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Zemach A., Zilberman D. Evolution of eukaryotic DNA methylation and the pursuit of safer sex. Curr. Biol. 2010; 20: R780-R5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Deaton A.M., Bird A. CpG islands and the regulation of transcription. Genes Dev. 2011; 25: 1010-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Weber M., Schübeler D. Genomic patterns of DNA methylation: Targets and function of an epigenetic mark. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2007; 19: 273-80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Ballestar E., Wolffe A.P. Methyl-CpG-binding proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001; 268: 1-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Baubec T., Ivanek R., Lienert F., Schübeler D. Methylation-dependent and -independent genomic targeting principles of the MBD protein family. Cell 2013; 153: 480-92.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Boyes J., Bird A. Repression of genes by DNA methylation depends on CpG density and promoter strength: Evidence for involvement of a methyl-CpG binding protein. EMBO J. 1992; 11: 327-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Hsieh C.-L. Dependence of transcriptional repression on CpG methylation density. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 5487-94.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Weber M., Hellmann I., Stadler M.B., Ramos L., Pääbo S., Rebhan M., Schübeler D. Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 2007; 39: 457-66.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Singer M., Kosti I., Pachter L., Mandel-Gutfreund Y. A diverse epigenetic landscape at human exons with implication for expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43: 3498-508.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Branco M.R., Ficz G., Reik W. Uncovering the role of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in the epigenome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011; 13: 7-13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Pastor W.A., Pape U.J., Huang Y. et al. Genome-wide mapping of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in embryonic stem cells. Nature 2011; 473: 394-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Yu M., Hon G.C., Szulwach K.E. et al. Base-resolution analysis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in the mammalian genome. Cell 2012; 149: 1368-80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Spruijt C.G., Gnerlich F., Smits A.H. et al. Dynamic readers for 5-(hydroxy)methylcytosine and its oxidized derivatives. Cell 2013; 152: 1146-59.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Takai H., Masuda K., Sato T. et al. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine plays a critical role in glioblastomagenesis by recruiting the CHTOP-methylosome complex. Cell Rep. 2014; 9: 48-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Jurkowska R.Z., Jurkowski T.P., Jeltsch A. Structure and function of mammalian DNA methyltransferases. Chembiochem. 2011; 12: 206-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Chuang L.S.-H., Ian H.-I., Koh T.-W. et al. Human DNA-(cytosine-5) methyltransferase-PCNA complex as a target for p21WAF1. Science 1997; 277: 1996-2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Iida T., Suetake I., Tajima S. et al. PCNA clamp facilitates action of DNA cytosine methyltransferase 1 on hemimethylated DNA. Genes Cells 2002; 7: 997-1007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Rountree M.R., Bachman K.E., Baylin S.B. DNMT1 binds HDAC2 and a new co-repressor, DMAP1, to form a complex at replication foci. Nat. Genet. 2000; 25: 269-77.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Viré E., Brenner C., Deplus R. et al. The Polycomb group protein EZH2 directly controls DNA methylation. Nature 2006; 439: 871-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Kato Y., Kaneda M., Hata K. et al. Role of the Dnmt3 family in de novo methylation of imprinted and repetitive sequences during male germ cell development in the mouse. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2007; 16: 2272-80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Watanabe D., Suetake I., Tada T., Tajima S. Stage- and cell-specific expression of Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b during embryogenesis. Mech. Dev. 2002; 118: 187-90.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Okano M., Bell D.W., Haber D.A., Li E. DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 1999; 99: 247-57.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Aapola U., Shibuya K., Scott H.S. et al. Isolation and initial characterization of a novel zinc finger gene, DNMT3L, on 21q22.3, related to the cytosine-5-methyltransferase 3 gene family. Genomics. 2000; 65: 293-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Bourc'his D., Xu G.-L., Lin C.-S. et al. Dnmt3L and the establishment of maternal genomic imprints. Science 2001; 294: 2536-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Jia D., Jurkowska R.Z., Zhang X. et al. Structure of Dnmt3a bound to Dnmt3L suggests a model for de novo DNA methylation. Nature 2007; 449: 248-51.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Goll M.G., Kirpekar F., Maggert K.A. et al. Methylation of tRNAAsp by the DNA methyltransferase homolog Dnmt2. Science 2006; 311: 395-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Bheemanaik S., Reddy Y.V.R., Rao D.N. Structure, function and mechanism of exocyclic DNA methyltransferases. Biochem. J. 2006; 399: 177-90.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Santos F., Peat J., Burgess H. et al. Active demethylation in mouse zygotes involves cytosine deamination and base excision repair. Epigenetics Chromatin 2013; 6: 39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Franchini D.-M., Schmitz K.-M., Petersen-Mahrt S.K. 5-Methylcytosine DNA demethylation: More than losing a methyl group. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2012; 46: 419-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Tahiliani M., Koh K.P., Shen Y. et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science 2009; 324: 930-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>He Y.-F., Li B.-Z., Li Z. et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science 2011; 333: 1303-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Ito S., Shen L., Dai Q. et al. Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science 2011; 333: 1300-3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Moran-Crusio K., Reavie L., Shih A. et al. Tet2 loss leads to increased hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and myeloid transformation. Cancer Cell 2011; 20: 11-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Dawlaty M.M., Ganz K., Powell B.E. et al. Tet1 is dispensable for maintaining pluripotency and its loss is compatible with embryonic and postnatal development. Cell Stem Cell 2011; 9: 166-75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Gu T.-P., Guo F., Yang H. et al. The role of Tet3 DNA dioxygenase in epigenetic reprogramming by oocytes. Nature 2011; 477: 606-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Conticello S.G. The AId/aP0BEC family of nucleic acid mutators. Genome Biol. 2008; 9: 229.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Storb U., Stavnezer J. Immunoglobulin genes: Generating diversity with AID and UNG. Curr. Biol. 2002; 12: R725-R7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Popp C., Dean W., Feng S. et al. Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature 2010; 463: 1101-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Kumar R., DiMenna L., Schrode N. et al. AID stabilizes stem-cell phenotype by removing epigenetic memory of pluripotency genes. Nature 2013; 500: 89-92.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Nabel C.S., Jia H., Ye Y. et al. AID/AP0BEC deaminases disfavor modified cytosines implicated in DNA demethylation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2012; 8: 751-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Wallace S.S. Base excision repair: A critical player in many games. DNA Repair. 2014; 19: 14-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Barreto G., Schäfer A., Marhold J. et al. Gadd45a promotes epigenetic gene activation by repair-mediated DNA demethylation. Nature 2007; 445: 671-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Moréra S., Grin I., Vigouroux A. et al. Biochemical and structural characterization of the glycosylase domain of MBD4 bound to thymine and 5-hydroxymethyuracil-containing DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40: 9917-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Sabag 0., Zamir A., Keshet I. et al. Establishment of methylation patterns in ES cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2014; 21: 110-2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Lucey M.J., Chen D., Lopez-Garcia J. et al. T:G mismatch-specific thymine-DNA glycosylase tTDG) as a coregulator of transcription interacts with SRC1 family members through a novel tyrosine repeat motif. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33: 6393-404.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Léger H., Smet-Nocca C., Attmane-Elakeb A. et al. A TDG/ CBP/RARa ternary complex mediates the retinoic acid-dependent expression of DNA methylation-sensitive genes. Genomics Prot. Bioinform. 2014; 12: 8-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Tini M., Benecke A., Um S.-J. et al. Association of CBP/ p300 acetylase and thymine DNA glycosylase links DNA repair and transcription. Mol. Cell 2002; 9: 265-77.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Cortazar D., Kunz C., Selfridge J. et al. Embryonic lethal phenotype reveals a function of TDG in maintaining epigenetic stability. Nature 2011; 470: 419-23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Li Y.-Q., Zhou P.-Z., Zheng X.-D. et al. Association of Dnmt3a and thymine DNA glycosylase links DNA methylation with base-excision repair. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35: 390-400.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Boland M.J., Christman J.K. Characterization of Dnmt3b:thymine-DNA glycosylase interaction and stimulation of thymine glycosylase-mediated repair by DNA methyltransferasets) and RNA. J. Mol. Biol. 2008; 379: 492-504.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Grin I., Ishchenko A.A. An interplay of the base excision repair and mismatch repair pathways in active DNA demethylation. Nucleic Acids Res. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw059.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Herman J.G., Baylin S.B. Gene silencing in cancer in association with promoter hypermethylation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003; 349: 2042-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Hambach L., Ling K.-W., Pool J. et al. Hypomethylating drugs convert HA-1-negative solid tumors into targets for stem cell-based immunotherapy. Blood 2009; 113: 2715-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Saunthararajah Y., Lavelle D., DeSimone J. DNA hypomethylating agents and sickle cell disease. Br. J. Haematol. 2004; 126: 629-36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Lienert F., Wirbelauer C., Som I. et al. Identification of genetic elements that autonomously determine DNA methylation states. Nat. Genet. 2011; 43: 1091-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Yu D.-H., Waterland R.A., Zhang P. et al. Targeted p16Ink4a epimutation causes tumorigenesis and reduces survival in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2014; 124: 3708-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Hsiao S.-H., Lee K.-D., Hsu C.-C. et al. DNA methylation of the Trip10 promoter accelerates mesenchymal stem cell lineage determination. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010; 400: 305-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Lee K.-D., Pai M.-Y., Hsu C.-C. et al. Targeted Casp8AP2 methylation increases drug resistance in mesenchymal stem cells and cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012; 422: 578-85.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Leu Y.-W., Huang T.H.-M., Hsiao S.-H. Epigenetic reprogramming of mesenchymal stem cells. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2013; 754: 195-211.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Teng I.-W., Hou P.-C., Lee K.-D. et al. Targeted methylation of two tumor suppressor genes is sufficient to transform mesenchymal stem cells into cancer stem/initiating cells. Cancer Res. 2011; 71: 4653-63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>van der Gun B.T.F., Maluszynska-Hoffman M., Kiss A. et al. Targeted DNA methylation by a DNA methyltransferase coupled to a triple helix forming oligonucleotide to down-regulate the epithelial cell adhesion molecule. Bioconjug. Chem. 2010; 21: 1239-45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Xu G.-L., Bestor T.H. Cytosine methylation targetted to predetermined sequences. Nat. Genet. 1997; 17: 376-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>Carvin C.D., Parr R.D., Kladde M.P. Site-selective in vivo targeting of cytosine-5 DNA methylation by zinc-finger proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31: 6493-501.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>McNamara A.R., Hurd P.J., Smith A.E.F., Ford K.G. Characterisation of site - biased DNA methyltransferases: Specificity, affinity and subsite relationships. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002; 30: 3818-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><mixed-citation>Smith A.E., Ford K.G. Specific targeting of cytosine methylation to DNA sequences in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35: 740-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><mixed-citation>Smith A.E., Hurd P.J., Bannister A.J., Kouzarides T., Ford K.G. Heritable gene repression through the action of a directed DNA methyltransferase at a chromosomal locus. J. Biol. Chem. 2008; 283: 9878-85.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B68"><label>68.</label><mixed-citation>Nomura W., Barbas C.F., III In vivo site-specific DNA methylation with a designed sequence-enabled DNA methylase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 8676-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B69"><label>69.</label><mixed-citation>Chaikind B., Kilambi K.P., Gray J.J., Ostermeier M. Targeted DNA methylation using an artificially bisected M.HhaI fused to zinc fingers. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e44852.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B70"><label>70.</label><mixed-citation>Slaska-Kiss K., Timâr E., Kiss A. Complementation between inactive fragments of SssI DNA methyltransferase. BMC Mol. Biol. 2012; 13: 17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B71"><label>71.</label><mixed-citation>Meister G.E., Chandrasegaran S., Ostermeier M. An engineered split M.HhaI-zinc finger fusion lacks the intended methyltransferase specificity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008; 377: 226-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B72"><label>72.</label><mixed-citation>Chaikind B., Ostermeier M. Directed evolution of improved zinc finger methyltransferases. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e96931.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B73"><label>73.</label><mixed-citation>Nunna S., Reinhardt R., Ragozin S., Jeltsch A. Targeted methylation of the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) promoter to silence its expression in ovarian cancer cells. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e87703.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B74"><label>74.</label><mixed-citation>Siddique A.N., Nunna S., Rajavelu A. et al. Targeted methylation and gene silencing of VEGF-A in human cells by using a designed Dnmt3a-Dnmt3L single-chain fusion protein with increased DNA methylation activity. J. Mol. Biol. 2013; 425: 479-91.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B75"><label>75.</label><mixed-citation>Rivenbark A.G., Stolzenburg S., Beltran A.S. et al. Epigenetic reprogramming of cancer cells via targeted DNA methylation. Epigenetics 2012; 7: 350-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B76"><label>76.</label><mixed-citation>Minczuk M., Papworth M.A., Kolasinska P. et al. Sequence-specific modification of mitochondrial DNA using a chimeric zinc finger methylase. PNAS USA 2006; 103: 19689-94.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B77"><label>77.</label><mixed-citation>Valton J., Cabaniols J.-P., Galetto R. et al. fficient strategies for TALEN-mediated genome editing in mammalian cell lines. Methods 2014; 69: 151-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B78"><label>78.</label><mixed-citation>Bernstein D.L., Le Lay J.E., Ruano E.G., Kaestner K.H. TALE-mediated epigenetic suppression of CDKN2A increases replication in human fibroblasts. J. Clin. Invest. 2015; 125: 1998-2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B79"><label>79.</label><mixed-citation>Maeder M.L., Angstman J.F., Richardson M.E. et al. Targeted DNA demethylation and activation of endogenous genes using programmable TALE-TET1 fusion proteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013; 31: 1137-42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B80"><label>80.</label><mixed-citation>Chen H., Kazemier H.G., de Groote M.L. et al. Induced DNA demethylation by targeting Ten-Eleven Translocation 2 to the human ICAM-1 promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42: 1563-74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B81"><label>81.</label><mixed-citation>Gregory D.J., Zhang Y., Kobzik L., Fedulov A.V. Specific transcriptional enhancement of inducible nitric oxide synthase by targeted promoter demethylation. Epigenetics 2013; 8: 1205-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B82"><label>82.</label><mixed-citation>Gregory D.J., Mikhaylova L., Fedulov A.V. Selective DNA demethylation by fusion of TDG with a sequence-specific DNA-binding domain. Epigenetics 2012; 7: 344-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B83"><label>83.</label><mixed-citation>Cortazar D., Kunz C., Saito Y. et al. The enigmatic thymine DNA glycosylase. DNA Repair 2007; 6: 489-504.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B84"><label>84.</label><mixed-citation>Yaung S.J., Esvelt K.M., Church G.M. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated phage resistance is not impeded by the DNA modifications of phage T4. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e98811.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B85"><label>85.</label><mixed-citation>Li F., Papworth M., Minczuk M., Rohde C., Zhang Y., Ragozin S., Jeltsch A. Chimeric DNA methyltransferases target DNA methylation to specific DNA sequences and repress expression of target genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35: 100-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B86"><label>86.</label><mixed-citation>Hsu C.-C., Li H.-P., Hung Y.-H. et al. Targeted methylation of CMV and E1A viral promoters. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010; 402: 228-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B87"><label>87.</label><mixed-citation>Law J.A., Jacobsen S.E. Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010; 11: 204-20.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
