Pathomorphologic characteristics of venous vessels after the application of different methods of endovascular eliminating of venous reflux - experimental study



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Varicose veins have been the subject of a recent technologies of nontumescent treatment that outline the safety and effectiveness questions concerning proposed obliteration methods. The goal of this study is to analyze changes in the venous wall structure appearing as a result of using thermal tumescent and nonthermal nontumescent methods in compare. Methods: microscopic investigation of vein specimens of adult sheep (n=9) performed on 1, 7 and 100 day after procedure to determine the grade of damage and inflammation. Results: On the 1st and 7th days after the use of endovenous laser, endothelial destruction was 100%, with total depth damage of vein wall and total destruction of the elastic carcass, also traces of carbonization on the first and vaporization on the seventh day have been seen. In a result of the use of nonthermal method, there was a residual endothelium up to 30%; with the use of cyanoacrylate glue - up to 10%. In the long-term period of observation, glue masses undergo a sewage process and is preserved as separate lumps, there is an abundance of multicore macrophages with fragmented glue in the cytoplasm. Conclusion: the results allow us to consider nonthermal nontumescent methods as a possible alternative to thermal methods available in clinical practice.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

T. I Abrosimova

Lomonosov Interdistrict Hospital

Email: abrosimova9409@gmail.com

A. V Kurmanskii

Ryazan State Medical University

A. A Borisov

Ryazan State Medical University

References

  1. Criqui M. Chronic venous disease in an ethnically diverse population: the San Diego population study. AJE 2003; 158(V): 448-56.
  2. Callam M.J. Epidemiology of varicose veins. BJS 1994; 81: 167-73.
  3. Zolotukhin I., Seliverstov E., Shevtsov Y. et al. Prevalence and risk factors for chronic venous disease in the general russian population. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovascular Surg. 2017; 54: 752-8.
  4. Wittens C., Davies A.H., Bakgaard N. et al. Management of chronic venous disease: clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2015; 49: 678-737.
  5. Van den Bos R., Arends L., Kockaert M. et al. Endovenous therapies of lower extremity varicosities: a meta-analysis. J. Vasc. Surg. 2009; 49: 230-9.
  6. Belramman A., Bootun R., Lane T.R.A. et al. Endovenous Management of Varicose Veins. Angiology 2019; 70: 388-96.
  7. Boersma D., van Eekeren R.R., Werson D.A. et al. Mechano-chemical endovenous ablation of small saphenous vein insufficiency using the ClariVein® device: one-year results of a prospective series. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2013; 45: 299-303.
  8. Subwongcharoen S., Praditphol N., Chitwiset S. Endovenous microwave ablation of varicose veins: in vitro, live swine model, and clinical study. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques 2009; 19: 170-4.
  9. Rabe E., Puskas A., Scuderi A. et al. Epidemiology of chronic venous disorders in geographically diverse populations: results from the Vein Consult Program. Int. Angiol. 2012; 3: 105-15.
  10. Rasmussen L.H., Lawaetz M., Bjoern L. et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. BJS 2011; 98: 1079-87.
  11. Van Eekeren R.R., Boersma D., Konijn V. et al. Postoperative pain and early quality of life after radiofrequency ablation and mechanochemical endovenous ablation of incompetent great saphenous veins. J. Vasc. Surg. 2013; 57: 445-50.
  12. Boersma D., van Haelst S.T., van Eekeren R.R. et al. Macroscopic and Histologic Analysis of Vessel Wall Reaction After Mechanochemical Endovenous Ablation Using the ClariVein OC Device in an Animal Model. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2017; 53: 290-8.
  13. Tal M.G., Dos Santos S.J., Marano J.P. et al. Histologic findings after mechanochemical ablation in a caprine model with use of ClariVein®. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2015; 3: 81-5.
  14. Whiteley M.S., Dos Santos S.J., Lee C.T. et al. Mechanochemical ablation causes endothelial and medial damage to the vein wall resulting in deeper penetration of sclerosant compared with sclerotherapy alone in extrafascial great saphenous vein using an ex vivo model. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2017; 5: 370-77.
  15. Wang Y.M., Cheng L.F., Li N. Histopathological study of vascular changes after intra-arterial and intravenous injection of N-butyl-2-cyanoac-rylate. Chin. J. Dig. Dis. 2006; 7: 175-79.
  16. Kendler M., Averbeck M., Simon J.C. et al. Histology of saphenous veins after treatment with the ClariVein® device - an ex-vivo experiment. Journal of the German Society of Dermatology 2013; 11: 348-52.
  17. Alur i., Dodurga Y., Gune§ T. et al. Effects of endovenous laser ablation on vascular tissue: molecular genetics approach. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015; 8: 11043-7.
  18. Шайдаков Е.В., Илюхин Е.А., Петухов А.В. и др. Сравнение лазеров с длиной волны 970 и 1470 нм при моделировании эндо-вазальной лазерной облитерации вен in vitro. Флебология 2011; 4: 23-30.
  19. Schmedt C.G., Sroka R., Steckmeier S. et al. Investigation on radiofrequency and laser (980 nm) effects after endoluminal treatment of saphenous vein insufficiency in an ex-vivo model. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2006; 32: 318-25.
  20. Almeida J.I., Min R.J., Raabe R. et al. Cyanoacrylate adhesive for the closure of truncal veins: 60-day swine model results. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2011; 45: 631-5.
  21. Min R.J., Almeida J.I., McLean D.J. et al. Novel vein closure procedure using a proprietary cyanoacrylate adhesive: 30-day swine modelresults. Phlebology 2012; 27: 398-403.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2020 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: 

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies